adobe premiere elements vs corel videostudio pro

Corel VideoStudio Pro X2 imports HDV, AVCHD, BDMV (files from Blu-ray camcorders, but such devices haven't yet arrived in this country), and it exports to BDAV, BDMV, and AVCHD formats. In spite of these playback issues, finished projects looked fine. Corel says that it is working to ensure smooth high-definition playback in future updates to the application. On a more powerful system, a workstation with dual quad-core Intel Xeon processors, the performance improved markedly in both Smart Proxy and default modes.

However, on our test system - a Dell XPS M1730 laptop with a 2.8GHz Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000 CPU with 2GB of RAM and a 400GB RAID array - high-resolution AVCHD clips played back very slowly, at perhaps just one or two frames per second, and they looked jaggy even with Smart Proxy disabled. Furthermore, Corel VideoStudio Pro X2 is supposed to be optimised for quad-core CPUs and to take advantage of newer Intel CPUs that recognise SSE4 instructions, thereby providing a big performance boost on systems using them. Even in the middle of a project, you can easily enable and disable the Smart Proxy mode by clicking a button on the timeline.Ĭorel says that it increased the Smart Proxy feature's speed by 300 percent over the preceding VideoStudio 11.5.

In other words, you can use Corel VideoStudio Pro X2 just as easily as you could with standard-definition video (and perhaps even more easily, because the proxy-mode footage is at a lower resolution than most standard-resolution footage). While the image quality isn't great in Smart Proxy mode, you can see well enough to apply effects in addition, you can scrub back and forth in the timeline with no lag, and files play quickly and smoothly.

Adobe premiere elements vs corel videostudio pro